Legal Blog

Supreme Court: Public Schools Are Limited in Regulating Student Speech Made Out of School

On June 23, 2021, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Mahoney Area School District v. B. L., an important student free speech case which will have significant implications for how public schools regulate and punish off campus student speech. In its decision, the Supreme Court ruled 8-1 that a public high school violated a student’s First Amendment free speech rights by suspending her from the cheerleading squad as a result of her social media posts made outside of school and off school grounds. The Court held that while public schools may have a special interest in regulating certain off-campus student speech, the special interests claimed by Mahoney Area High School were insufficient to overcome Brandi Levy’s free speech rights.

In May 2017, Brandi Levy, a 14-year old Mahoney Area High School student failed to make the school’s varsity cheerleading squad. She posted a vulgar message on her Snapchat account expressing her frustration with not making the varsity squad (“F— school f— softball f— cheer f— everything”) and posted an image of her and her friend raising their middle fingers. She made this “Snap” on a weekend while visiting a local store and using her cellphone. The Snap automatically disappeared within 24 hours, but not before someone had taken a screenshot of it and forwarded it to a cheerleading coach. Mahoney Area High School punished Brandi for her Snap by suspending her from the junior varsity cheer squad.

In the 1969 Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School Dist., the Court held that public schools have a special interest in regulating on-campus student speech that “materially disrupts class-work or involves substantial disorder or invasion of the rights of others.” 393 U.S. 503 (1969). The Mahoney Court found that the facts in Brandi Levy’s case did not satisfy Tinker’s demanding standard. The Court determined that Mahoney Area High School’s interest in preventing disruption was not supported by the facts which showed that discussion about the Snap took, at most, five to ten minutes of an Algebra class “for just a couple of days” and that some members of the cheerleading team were “upset” about Brandi’s post.

Notably, the circumstances of Brandi’s speech diminished the school’s interest in regulating her speech. The Court deemed significant that: Brandi’s posting appeared outside of school hours from a location outside the school; she used her personal cellphone to transmit her speech to an audience of her private group of Snapchat friends; and that she did not identify the school in her Snap or target any member of the school community with vulgar or abusive language. The Court’s decision in Mahoney does not prevent a public school from punishing all off campus speech. In particular, a public school may regulate off campus speech that involves severe bullying or harassment of specific individuals, threats against teachers or other students, or cheating.


Lisa Seltzer Becker is a Principal at Offit Kurman, P.A. She can be reached at (240) 507-1780;


Lisa Seltzer Becker began practicing law in 1996.  Her practice has always focused on Family Law and Education Law.

As an experienced Family Law attorney, Ms. Becker has helped numerous clients in Maryland and the District of Columbia with their divorce and custody matters.  As an experienced litigator, Ms. Becker is also a trained Collaborative practitioner and a skilled negotiator.  She uses these skills whenever possible to reach an agreement outside the courtroom, so as to obtain the best outcome for her clients in the most cost-efficient manner.  Ms. Becker is a trained mediator and offers this service for divorce and custody cases.







Offit Kurman, one of the fastest-growing, full-service law firms in the United States, serves dynamic businesses, individuals and families. With 15 offices and nearly 250 lawyers who counsel clients across more than 30 areas of practice, Offit Kurman helps maximize and protect business value and personal wealth by providing innovative and entrepreneurial counsel that focuses on clients’ business objectives, interests and goals. The firm is distinguished by the quality, breadth and global reach of its legal services and a unique operational structure that encourages a culture of collaboration. For more information, visit