Legal Blog

Arbitration vs. Litigation

 Facebook Twitter Copy link Email Signed model release on file with Shutterstock, Inc. Large • 5472 × 3648 pixels 18.2 × 12.2 in • 300 DPI • JPEG Select size / format Select license type Standard License Included in plan Limited usage in print, advertising, and packaging. Unlimited web distribution. Enhanced License $99.00 Unlimited usage in print, advertising, packaging, and merchandising. Unlimited web distribution. Edit this image Royalty-free stock photo ID: 1256570866 Lawyer solicitor with clasped hands consulting client about document making financial legal deal sell law services, close up view of business counselor or agreement party at contract signing The main difference between arbitration and litigation is that litigation requires Court involvement and arbitration does not. Litigation is a process that requires a decision be made by a Judge or a jury. In most jurisdictions, matters are determined by a Judge rather than a jury. The primary downside of litigation is the limitations that involve court deadlines and calendars. Because of the pandemic, domestic or family law cases may not be heard for months, if not years. The parties have no say as to who their Judge will be in most cases, and the parties cannot control the date of their hearing, or whether the case will proceed without delay.

Unfortunately, it is often the case that a hearing is delayed after it begins, for weeks or months, if another date is necessary. For example, if the parties agree that the trial will take four days, and the Court sets in a hearing for four days, because of events out of the parties’ control, the commencement of the hearing may be delayed until late in the day, or may not commence until the following day. There may be other matters on the Judge’s calendar for the day, such as sentencing or motions hearings. As a result, the parties’ case may not proceed for 5 hours a day, day after day, as they would have expected. If that occurs, and it often does, the parties may have to wait weeks or months for another day or two to conclude their case.

The result is that expert witnesses, and other witnesses, will have to be rescheduled, and the Judge may not have adequate notes or recollection to recall all of what was presented to the Judge during the first few days of trial.

Another limitation is that the parties do not have the ability to select the Judge who will hear their case, in most instances. Some Judges have more experience than others, and, in complex matters, the Judge’s experience and expertise may significantly affect the outcome.  If the parties elect arbitration, rather than litigation, they can select their arbitrator from a list of retired Judges and experienced family law attorneys who have been trained and certified as arbitrators by the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers.

If the parties decide to proceed with arbitration, they cannot only choose the arbitrator, and the dates and times of the proceedings, they can also make decisions as to what evidence will be presented, and whether or not the rules of evidence will be followed.

Most importantly, arbitration is a private matter. The hearing is not public, whereas court hearings are open to the public. This is a very important factor for most of those going through a divorce.

The arbitration process is fairly quick. Once the parties choose the arbitrator and set the rules as to how and when the hearing will proceed (by way of a written contract), the matter can proceed expeditiously.

The costs of arbitration are the same as those of litigation, other than the cost of the arbitrator. However, when one compares the cost of the arbitrator, vis a vis a Judge for whom there is no cost, one must consider the delays and lack of control that is a very significant part of litigation.


Cheryl Hepfer | 240.507.1752

Cheryl Hepfer is a highly-regarded attorney who has practiced family law for more than 40 years. She has been rated by her peers and is listed in Best Lawyers in America and as a top lawyer in the Washingtonian, Bethesda Magazine, and Super Lawyers. She is past president of both the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers and the International Academy of Family Lawyers.












At Offit Kurman, we are our clients’ most trusted legal advisors, professionals who help maximize and protect business value and personal wealth. In every interaction, we focus on furthering our clients’ objectives and provide timely services and within budget, all while focusing on the clients’ interests and goals.

Offit Kurman is one of the fastest-growing, full-service law firms in the United States. With over 230 attorneys offering a comprehensive range of services in virtually every legal category, the firm is well-positioned to meet dynamic businesses’ needs, as well as the needs of the people who own and operate them. We also provide representation of individuals and families in diverse matters ranging from estate planning and asset protection to intellectual property structuring and entrepreneurial start-ups. Our International Group provides clients with a broad range of services for transactions and dispute representation for clients worldwide, including Europe, Canada, Asia, Latin America, the Middle East and Africa.

At Offit Kurman, we distinguish ourselves by the quality, breadth, and global reach of our legal services — as well as our unique operational structure, which encourages a culture of collaboration and entrepreneurialism. The same approach that makes our firm attractive to legal practitioners interested in representing clients in the middle market, also gives clients access to experienced counsel in almost every area of the law and in many jurisdictions in the U.S. and abroad

Subscribe and follow us on our Blog, and on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn. You can also sign up to receive LawMatters, Offit Kurman’s monthly newsletter covering a diverse selection of legal and corporate thought leadership content.