I’m a Potential M&A Buyer; Should I Focus on Buying Stocks (Equities) or Buying Assets?
When an M&A buyer is looking into a target company, they’re faced with the decision whether to buy stocks (the equities) or acquire assets. But what’s the difference?
A stock purchase involves the purchase of the selling company’s stock only. Simply put: the buyer acquires all of the outstanding stock of the target company directly from the target company’s stockholders, including the assets, rights, and liabilities. The buyer then steps in the shoes of the selling stockholders (switches places). Stock purchases are generally straightforward transactions. Both parties sign a Stock Purchase Agreement (a sales agreement used to transfer and assign ownership in a corporation) and any other related documents that outline the terms of the deal, and the sellers then transfer their stock to the buyer.
It seems simple enough, right? For the most part. There are risks, such as unknown or undisclosed liabilities of the target company. Again, when you purchase the stock, you become the stockholder; thus, nothing at the company level changes (save perhaps change of control issues). Operations remain intact as do all risks and liabilities. In addition, stock sales generally have favorable tax treatment for sellers.
But what if you don’t want to buy everything and/or you want to limit your risk exposure? You might then be more interested in an asset purchase.
An asset purchase is an agreement between a buyer and seller to acquire a company’s assets. This means: the buyer only acquires the assets, rights, and liabilities it identifies and agrees to acquire and assume. Assets can be both tangible, such as offices and equipment, and intangible, such an intellectual property and corporate name. Asset purchases are a good option if you’re looking for more flexibility and don’t want to pay for unwanted assets. Further to that point, it means less risk of assuming unknown or undisclosed liabilities. Asset purchase transactions are generally more favorable to a buyer and at times less favorable to a seller.
Some buyers may be deterred by asset acquisitions because they’re more complex than stock purchases. The buyer has to spend time identifying the assets it wishes to acquire/assume. By doing so, the buyer may potentially overlook an important asset required to run the business it’s acquiring. Asset purchases have more formalities and documents since they require a separate transfer for each of the identified assets and liabilities of the target company. They may also require more third-party consent since the contracts assumed by the buyer are likely to contain anti-assignment clauses (which prevents either party the ability to assign tasks to a third party without the agreement of the non-assigning party).
Whether you’re considering a stock purchase or an asset purchase, it’s always best to discuss it with an M&A attorney first. Selecting the form of the transaction is a key consideration when targeting the purchase of a business. There are many variables to consider as to why a transaction is set as a stock purchase versus an asset purchase.
Do you want to vet a business opportunity? Is there an anticipated commercial dispute? Is a second legal opinion warranted? Grab 15 minutes with me and I will work with you to understand your situation and provide my thoughts based upon successfully representing business owners for almost 25 years. You will receive a confirmation with a Teams Meeting invitation after you pick a time for our discussion. You can also reach out to me at firstname.lastname@example.org.
ABOUT MIKE MERCURIO
email@example.com | 301.575.0332
Michael N. Mercurio is a leading attorney in the field of mergers and acquisitions (M&A). He serves as outside general counsel in buy-side and sell-side M&A, as well as in all business law and real estate law matters. As a strategic partner to firm clients, Mr. Mercurio regularly counsels entrepreneurial individuals and assorted entities on the many challenges, issues, and opportunities companies face throughout the business lifecycle—from start-up to eventual exit.
ABOUT OFFIT KURMAN
Offit Kurman is one of the fastest-growing full-service law firms in the United States. With 14 offices in seven states, and the District of Columbia, and growing by 50% in two years through expansions in New York City and Charlotte, North Carolina, Offit Kurman is well-positioned to meet the legal needs of dynamic businesses and the individuals who own and operate them. For over 30 years, we’ve represented privately held companies and families of wealth throughout their business life cycles.
Whatever and wherever your industry, Offit Kurman is the better way to protect your business, preserve your family’s wealth, and resolve your most challenging legal conflicts. At Offit Kurman, we distinguish ourselves by the quality and breadth of our legal services—as well as our unique operational structure, which encourages a culture of collaboration and entrepreneurialism. The same approach that makes our firm attractive to legal practitioners also gives clients access to experienced counsel in every area of the law.
Find out why Offit Kurman is The Better Way to protect your business, your assets and your family by connecting via our Blog, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn pages. You can also sign up to receive LawMatters, Offit Kurman’s monthly newsletter covering a diverse selection of legal and corporate thought leadership content.
DELAWARE | MARYLAND | NEW JERSEY | NEW YORK | NORTH CAROLINA | PENNSYLVANIA | VIRGINIA | WASHINGTON, DC