Legal Blog

When’s A Property Settlement Agreement Not A Property Settlement Agreement? (Part One)

In this first of a multi-part series (read part two here), I address some of the multiple potential “uses” to which one can put a property settlement agreement, or PSA, to use when other options aren’t available.

“How’s that?” you ask.  For starters, to constitute a deed in Virginia at least, one thing not required of a document is that it be titled “deed” to be a deed.  To be a valid Virginia deed, a document – regardless of its title — must reflect a “present intent to transfer” to an identifiable recipient and actually be signed by one transferring an interest insufficiently identified the real property.

Recently, a judgment-creditor client was pursuing a multi-million dollar, post-judgment collection.  The client’s effort to reach some real property of the debtor in partial satisfaction of the judgment amount faced derailment upon learning that the crafty debtor had successfully avoided finalizing his divorce from his estranged wife. According to the land records, the property, therefore, appeared to remain subject to “tenancy by the entirety” (TBE) protection from creditor claims.  A little third-party discovery from the debtor’s “ex-wife” confirmed she claimed no interest in the property and further revealed a legally enforceable PSA signed by the estranged spouses (despite not having finalized their divorce). The PSA terms included an expression of her present intent to transfer to the debtor-spouse all of her interest in the couple’s real property, which was sufficiently identified for Virginia deed purposes.

Our adversary sought pre-trial dismissal arguing (among other things) that a PSA could not be a deed and that even if one could, this PSA wasn’t one because it lacked any “present intention to transfer” language.  Accepting the premise that the PSA itself could legally be a deed, the Circuit Court refused to dismiss the case, and instead, afforded the judgment-creditor the right to have a jury decide whether the PSA sufficiently expressed the non-debtor spouse’s “present intent to transfer” the real property.

Voila!  When is a property settlement agreement not a property settlement agreement?  When it’s a deed!  In my example, a little creative lawyering (and a receptive, open-minded judge!) afforded the judgment-creditor client newfound negotiating leverage from a seemingly unassailable TBE property interest of a “married” judgment-debtor.  At least on that occasion, called upon to serve the judgment-creditor’s need as “deed,” the estranged couple’s PSA unwittingly “doffed” its name, yet smelled every bit as sweet, indeed! (See what I deed there?)


As a Principal with Offit Kurman’s Commercial Litigation Group, Mr. Repczynski is an Estate and Trust litigator and business litigation lawyer emphasizing will/trust disputes, creditors’ rights enforcement, and B2B business disputes.  Together with OK’s legal team now spanning from NYC to Charlotte, North Carolina, Tom provides general counsel to a wide array of businesses (foreign and domestic), associations (local and international non-profits), individuals (personally and in representative capacities), and lenders (traditional and Sharia) in federal, state, and bankruptcy courts as well as ADR and administrative proceedings relating primarily to inheritance-related disputes, general business contract and tort issues, and divorce-impacting bankruptcies.  Over the past 30 years, Tom has co-owned and operated an exterior painting business and a used furniture business; clerked in the Starr OIC and interned at both Main Justice and the Court of Federal Claims; chaired two local Bar association Boards, two community architectural review boards (VA and NC), and the Committee of Boy Scout Troop 688.  Tom currently chairs the South Fairfax Chamber of Commerce; announces local high school football games; actively supports local dance and musical theater; and umpires Little League games when time allows.




Offit Kurman is one of the fastest-growing full-service law firms in the United States. With 14 offices in seven states, and the District of Columbia, and growing by 50% in two years through expansions in New York City and Charlotte, North Carolina, Offit Kurman is well-positioned to meet the legal needs of dynamic businesses and the individuals who own and operate them. For over 30 years, we’ve represented privately held companies and families of wealth throughout their business life cycles.

Whatever and wherever your industry, Offit Kurman is the better way to protect your business, preserve your family’s wealth, and resolve your most challenging legal conflicts. At Offit Kurman, we distinguish ourselves by the quality and breadth of our legal services—as well as our unique operational structure, which encourages a culture of collaboration and entrepreneurialism. The same approach that makes our firm attractive to legal practitioners also gives clients access to experienced counsel in every area of the law.

Find out why Offit Kurman is The Better Way to protect your business, your assets and your family by connecting via our Blog, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn pages. You can also sign up to receive LawMatters, Offit Kurman’s monthly newsletter covering a diverse selection of legal and corporate thought leadership content.