Showtime: ERCO Interior Sys., Inc. v. Nat’l Commercial Builders, Inc.
The New Jersey Appellate Division recently declined to enforce a forum selection clause on the basis that such enforcement would violate the strong public policy of New Jersey, and that disputes related to payments on New Jersey construction projects be brought in New Jersey.
In the case of ERCO Interior Sys., Inc. v. Nat’l Commercial Builders, Inc., 2019 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 1037, 2019 WL 2004367 (App. Div. 2019), the contractor entered into a contract to construct movie screens in a theater at the Rio Mall in Rio Grande, NJ. Thereafter, the contractor entered into a subcontract with a subcontractor to install acoustical tiling in the theater. Despite the fact that the work was performed in New Jersey, the subcontract between the parties included a forum selection clause mandating that any litigation be brought in Kansas. After a dispute arose between the contractor and subcontractor regarding payment, the subcontractor filed suit in New Jersey alleging a violation of New Jersey’s Prompt Payment Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:30A-1, et seq. (“PPA”), among other claims. Relying upon the forum selection clause, the contractor moved to dismiss the lawsuit. The Appellate Division, in reversing the trial court’s decision, concluded that the “PPA embodies New Jersey’s strong public policy to ensure that contractors performing construction work in New Jersey are paid promptly. And, the requirement in N.J.S.A. 2A:30A-2(f) that all “civil actions brought to collect payments pursuant to” the PPA “shall be conducted inside of this State” is an essential element of that policy.” Accordingly, the Appellate Division ordered that the case remains in New Jersey.
While forum selection clauses are generally presumed to be valid and enforceable, New Jersey courts may decline to do so where the claims allege a violation of the PPA, and therefore, enforcement would violate the strong public policy of New Jersey.
If you have any questions on this topic or any other construction law topics, please contact Kathryn Pettit at email@example.com or 484.531.1706
ABOUT KATHRYN PETTIT
firstname.lastname@example.org | 484.531.1706
Kathryn E. Pettit, an associate in the firm’s suburban Philadelphia office, focuses her practice on construction law. Before becoming an attorney, Ms. Pettit received her Bachelors of Science in Civil Engineering from Syracuse University. She brings her technical background and perspective to the representation of her clients.
ABOUT OFFIT KURMAN
Offit Kurman is one of the fastest-growing, full-service law firms in the mid-Atlantic region. With over 185 attorneys offering a comprehensive range of services in virtually every legal category, the firm is well positioned to meet the needs of dynamic businesses and the people who own and operate them. Our twelve offices serve individual and corporate clients along the I95 corridor in the Virginia, Washington, DC, Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York City regions. At Offit Kurman, we are our clients’ most trusted legal advisors, professionals who help maximize and protect business value and personal wealth. In every interaction, we consistently maintain our clients’ confidence by remaining focused on furthering their objectives and achieving their goals in an efficient manner. Trust, knowledge, confidence—in a partner, that’s perfect.
Find out why Offit Kurman is The Better Way to protect your business, your assets and your family by connecting via our Blog, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, and LinkedIn pages. You can also sign up to receive LawMatters, Offit Kurman’s monthly newsletter covering a diverse selection of legal and corporate thought leadership content.
MARYLAND | PENNSYLVANIA | VIRGINIA | NEW JERSEY | NEW YORK | DELAWARE | WASHINGTON, DC